Did I do my Pacifics?
-
Seaboard Air Line Fan
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 9:49 pm
- Location: Virginia
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Did any of these engines or parts end up in the BTS bins?
BobD aka Drifty
The Crow Flies At Midnight
The Crow Flies At Midnight
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
I can make it purdy - just haven''t started yet.
- ScaleCraft
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
bob turner wrote:I can make it purdy - just haven''t started yet.
Better get busy, youngun..times a wastin!
Dave....gone by invitation
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Nope - a Jabelmann Challenger awaits me getting off the couch.
In my defense, I am doing annual inspections on two aircraft, just added an electric starter to my personal Piper Cub, and am getting ready to teach "Wills". Retirement is good!
In my defense, I am doing annual inspections on two aircraft, just added an electric starter to my personal Piper Cub, and am getting ready to teach "Wills". Retirement is good!
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
You got a couple of posters really worked up over there, just saying!bob turner wrote:Anybody notice the Q gauge thread on NK?
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
I have known Sam for a long time. He is a good guy. He has this wrong.
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Oh - I really got "B Smith" all worked up. I have never heard of this nonsense, and I bet I am the world's most prolific builder of 17/64 scale. I ought to qualify as some kind of expert.
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
bob turner wrote:Oh - I really got "B Smith" all worked up. I have never heard of this nonsense, and I bet I am the world's most prolific builder of 17/64 scale. I ought to qualify as some kind of expert.
Well, apparently not on that site...
Mark in Oregon
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Interesting if you search for 17/64s model trains on Wikipedia they have nothing, one poster even stated that Minton Cronkite built the original Chicago SF exhibit with outside 3rd rail , I guess all the "experts" are chiming in now.bob turner wrote:Oh - I really got "B Smith" all worked up. I have never heard of this nonsense, and I bet I am the world's most prolific builder of 17/64 scale. I ought to qualify as some kind of expert.
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
And now Simon is ganging up. What did I do to upset Nev? He is a nice guy and a skilled modeler.
Back to Pacifics - I am going to refrain from putting that ugly AN boiler on a Mike mech - it is just as ugly as the Pacific, except spoked drivers. It really, really needs a new sand dome. Someday. Herewith:
This is a Harriman Heavy in 17/64. It needs a new tender, and I have the sides all pressed out. Not sure what I am waiting for - the thing is elegant, and rests on Lobaugh 84" drivers, machined here from rough castings. The usual NWSL/Pittman, and it runs like a dream. I made a boiler for Harmon, and I think another one for someone else. A quarter century ago?
Back to Pacifics - I am going to refrain from putting that ugly AN boiler on a Mike mech - it is just as ugly as the Pacific, except spoked drivers. It really, really needs a new sand dome. Someday. Herewith:
This is a Harriman Heavy in 17/64. It needs a new tender, and I have the sides all pressed out. Not sure what I am waiting for - the thing is elegant, and rests on Lobaugh 84" drivers, machined here from rough castings. The usual NWSL/Pittman, and it runs like a dream. I made a boiler for Harmon, and I think another one for someone else. A quarter century ago?
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Very nice.
I'm sure it's "accurate", but that big 12-wheeled tender just looks too modern for the engine.
As you would say, "Opinion".
Mark in Oregon
I'm sure it's "accurate", but that big 12-wheeled tender just looks too modern for the engine.
As you would say, "Opinion".
Mark in Oregon
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
No - the locomotive is a UP P-77 in 17/64. Tender is a 1/4" scale Adams SP 160-C. A mis- match. I will get to it.
-
Carey Williams
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Hello Pacific admirers .
Thank you for posting all the nice photos of vintage engines .
My favorite ( and only) Pacific ( thus far) is the Scalecraft K4 ... did this come out in 1933 or 34 ? Undated flyer ..clearly states this is their first engine to be offered...but then it states 1/4 scale .... it is mighty big for 1/4" ..my bet is on 17/64ths....the K4 towers over their Hudson ..but same size /scale as a Congress Hudson. So there may be a few flaws in the description... but the rivet-less tender and headlight the size of a 55 gallon drum are spot on , also charming ( in my taste) ... let alone the cat whiskers pick up for the outside 3rd rail.
It is amazingly accurate the Johnson bar is ..as steam engines always seem to have a favored direction ....the K4 's is reverse , about twice the speed as forward.
One day looking forward to having more than a 6' mainline , till then back and forth and back and forth ....
Cheers Carey
please see exciting video of all the action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwn04aGsIg
Thank you for posting all the nice photos of vintage engines .
My favorite ( and only) Pacific ( thus far) is the Scalecraft K4 ... did this come out in 1933 or 34 ? Undated flyer ..clearly states this is their first engine to be offered...but then it states 1/4 scale .... it is mighty big for 1/4" ..my bet is on 17/64ths....the K4 towers over their Hudson ..but same size /scale as a Congress Hudson. So there may be a few flaws in the description... but the rivet-less tender and headlight the size of a 55 gallon drum are spot on , also charming ( in my taste) ... let alone the cat whiskers pick up for the outside 3rd rail.
It is amazingly accurate the Johnson bar is ..as steam engines always seem to have a favored direction ....the K4 's is reverse , about twice the speed as forward.
One day looking forward to having more than a 6' mainline , till then back and forth and back and forth ....
Cheers Carey
please see exciting video of all the action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwn04aGsIg
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
Like your third rail support chairs...simple, gets-the-job done in a no-nonsense fashion.
Can't tell, but is the third rail actually a rail, or a piece of brass bar?
I have 2 outside-third rail locomotives (that I know of!) that I am in the process
of converting back to two rail. The previous owner ran outside-third rail to the
bitter end, and had converted several two-rail locomotives to run on his system,
including a Weaver RS-2.
Can't tell, but is the third rail actually a rail, or a piece of brass bar?
I have 2 outside-third rail locomotives (that I know of!) that I am in the process
of converting back to two rail. The previous owner ran outside-third rail to the
bitter end, and had converted several two-rail locomotives to run on his system,
including a Weaver RS-2.
Take care,
Wolfgang
Wolfgang
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13645
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Did I do my Pacifics?
A re-run of my Scale Craft Pacifics starts now.
Return to “O-Gauge, 2-Rail, Model Railroading”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests