Has President Biden

[Neil]

They should show more gratitude to the people who saved their *** from Saddam Hussein. And they could try being less barbarians about the subject. They’re out of touch with reality, both biologic and political. Being gay is illegal? What about being tall or short? Or fat or thin? Or diabetic? Or Christian or Jewish? Wake up and join the 20th, or at least 21st century boys and girls. The Old Testament was written several thousand years ago by people we would now consider barbaric if they did time travel.

[robert.]

I’d pull our embassy out. I know a girl that works in kuwait. Everything in illegal unless you’re a wealthy male of a specific religion.

[HONDO74]

I’d pull our embassy out. I know a girl that works in kuwait. Everything in illegal unless you’re a wealthy male of a specific religion.

It is their religion. Do we have a right to interfere with how they think. ??

Also have you noticed that you never see those Muslim women in congress promoting LGBT.

[HONDO74]

The Old Testament was written several thousand years ago by people we would now consider barbaric if they did time travel.

The start of Islam is marked in the year 610, following the first revelation to the prophet Muhammad at the age of 40. Muhammad and his followers spread the teachings of Islam throughout the Arabian peninsula.

And Islam is now the fastest growing religion in the world. And one of their goals is to destroy the Jews

[gregj410]

Also have you noticed that you never see those Muslim women in congress promoting LGBT.

That’s because they hang them from cranes and stone them to death for being gay.

[robert.]

I’d pull our embassy out. I know a girl that works in kuwait. Everything in illegal unless you’re a wealthy male of a specific religion.

It is their religion. Do we have a right to interfere with how they think. ??

Also have you noticed that you never see those Muslim women in congress promoting LGBT.

Almost my point. We don’t need to be there and they don’t want us. It’s very hard to change a country’s way of life. Here or abroad.

[HONDO74]

Attorney General Merrick Garland is facing growing political pressure to enforce federal law that prohibits picketing outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes for the purpose of influencing a decision.

'the law is crystal clear'

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes, even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

It is becoming apparent that BIDEN and the democrats are promoting INSURRECTION in this country

[Neil]

Rubbish. Offering thoughts and prayers to our Supreme Court fascists.

[robert.]

It's their agnostic neighbors that are upset. I watched a guy on tv. Chris Coons from Delaware. He danced around the the question so much. He basically answered with a 5 day weather report.

[HONDO74]

Rubbish. Offering thoughts and prayers to our Supreme Court fascists.

So it's okay with you to assassinate Supreme Court judges but only the ones you don't like

[Neil]

"So it's okay with you to assassinate Supreme Court judges but only the ones you don't like."

Of course not. I'm not in favor of the death penalty nor assassination. I think peaceful demonstrations are part of first amendment rights, as defined by 200+ years of Supreme Court decisions and legislation. Fascists (about 50% of Republicans) favor allowing any jackass to own a weapon, regardless of their involvement in a well regulated militia (the part of the second amendment never mentioned by so-called strict constructionists and originalists). If the deviously appointed judges from the Trump administration vote in favor of freedom to bear arms regardless of the Constitution and common sense, but against freedom of women to control their own reproductive fates, they will ultimately get what they deserve. The historical shame reserved for the likes of the Dred Scott decision. If our elementary schools can only be defended by armed individuals, perhaps the Supreme Court justices just need to live in a well defended compound? They are out of touch with Americans, so make it official.

[robert.]

Every judge is out of touch. Free from termination for life. Not held accountable for poor decisions they make. Do we have any middle of the road judges?

[HONDO74]

but against freedom of women to control their own reproductive fates,

I will ask again. If the women didn't have control of there reproductive fates. How the FK did they get pregnant.

They chose to have sex. Were they too stupid to understand that they could get pregnant

[robert.]

The guy running for governor of PA. wont allow it even in the case of rape. I think that statement is the nail in his coffin. Others say that is what will get him elected. Imagine carrying the child of somebody that violated you? I cant believe the guy thinks that way. Life would be a lot simpler if we all just did better

[Neil]

"Were they too stupid to understand that they could get pregnant"

Well, Yale and Harvard educated judges don't seem to understand that a fertilized ovum isn't a baby, or that some women are raped, or that some contraceptives fail, or that some women work for employers who don't pay for contraceptives because they are religious fanatics, and the same judges allow these religious fanatics to impose their barbaric beliefs on others. So much for freedom of religion. Freedom of oppression more likely .