Has President Biden

[Rufus T. Firefly]

He has ability to speak.

Sure does. Can hold all the pep rallys with cheerleaders that he wants........

Social media has banned him.

As is their prerogative - social media has nothing to do with free speech; it's a business....

If the rest of the media stays away he has no voice. Oh but they can’t. They love the ratings.

And truly hilarious - like moths to the flames....while they make money.

[robert.]

If social media can ban him. They why does a baker need to make a lesbian couple’s cake? They’re a business also.

[Rufus T. Firefly]

If social media can ban him. They why does a baker need to make a lesbian couple’s cake? They’re a business also.

The court ruled in favor of the baker.... And that has nothing to with free speech either; that was a BS religious beliefs case.

[robert.]

I had to look that up. I was not aware that it went to the Supreme Court. I’m in agreement with the court Facebook and Twitter. As a business operator. Im not in agreement with any of the businesses mentioned. “I’ll work for anyone that pays me at the end of a day.

[v8vega]

Democrats have destroyed the meaning of impeachment, it means nothing now.

[Rufus T. Firefly]

’m in agreement with the court Facebook and Twitter.

Oh, the court of 15 secs of stupidity.....

[Rufus T. Firefly]

Democrats have destroyed the meaning of impeachment, it means nothing now.

Nope, both parties are fully to blame. No innocents here.

As long as we have totally polarized parties working in lockstep, not voting as actually representatives of their constituents and following their oaths of office, very little has any meaning.

[gregj410]

Uh oh Time to take the car keys. Looks like the Dems are a little concerned with sleepy Joe at the helm of the nukes.

https://politicodailynewss.com/democrat ... r-weapons/

[HONDO74]

Dozens of House Democrats want Biden to give up sole authority to launch nuclear weapons
'Vesting 1 person with this authority entails real risks,' the letter reads

The letter continues: "While any president would presumably consult with advisors before ordering a nuclear attack, there is no requirement to do so. The military is obligated to carry out the order if they assess it is legal under the laws of war. Under the current posture of U.S. nuclear forces, that attack would happen in minutes."

Democrats offered some alternatives to sole nuclear authority, such as requiring the vice president and House speaker to agree with a launch order from the president before it is executed

Democrats previously expressed concern with former President Trump having access to such power. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in January, for example, said she spoke with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley about protecting nuclear codes from an "unhinged president."

Pelosi said she spoke to Milley on Jan. 5 "to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike."

[E7]

Democrats offered some alternatives to sole nuclear authority, such as requiring the vice president and House speaker to agree with a launch order from the president before it is executed

Hmmmmm...."The Three Stooges"


Pelosi said she spoke to Milley on Jan. 5 "to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike."[/quote]

Was old Nance so obsessed with Trump during the election that she didn't think of this possibility?

[HONDO74]

Just think how it will work out when the call comes at 2 am that we have incoming missiles,,

I will have to consult with Nancy And Kamala and get back with you

Nancy got legislation passed last year to prevent Trump from going to war with any country without congress approval.

Sounds good to me as it also prevents Biden from doing the same thing....

[robert.]

Just think how it will work out when the call comes at 2 am that we have incoming missiles,,

I will have to consult with Nancy And Kamala and get back with you

Nancy got legislation passed last year to prevent Trump from going to war with any country without congress approval.

Sounds good to me as it also prevents Biden from doing the same thing....

Incoming missiles don't need a president's approval to be shot down. An offensive attack does. I don't like Nancy. Yet i think this is a great move. We should call it the "Heisman Gambit". Taking the football trophy away from the winner. If she had tried this while trump was president. It would have never got approval. Now it will pass. Her people will vote for it and the Republicans will run to the stage to say yes. Great political chess move on her part. We probably have a 99.9999999 percent chance that the USA will never lunch a first strike nuke attack. Along with a 99.9999999 percent chance that nobody lunches a strike against us. Dirty bomb. that's a different story. All these nuke bombs are just playground bully BS and a way to spend money.

[Rufus T. Firefly]

Dirty bomb. that's a different story.

Nasty. Used to work on drug development to treat exposed people post-event; that's an area that's not been updated in decades now.

[gregj410]

Oh boy! That card better say I live at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave

https://youtu.be/9JJQLXzyadM

[HONDO74]

Biden takes first military action with Syria strike on Iran-backed militias
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-56205056

The US has carried out an air strike targeting Iran-backed militias in Syria, in the first military action undertaken by the Biden administration.

The Pentagon said the strike destroyed "multiple facilities" and was ordered in response to attacks against US and coalition personnel in Iraq.

Kataib Hezbollah and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada have previously carried out or supported rocket attacks targeting US assets in the country. The US has launched retaliatory strikes.

But Kataib Hezbollah has denied involvement in recent attacks against US interests.

In its statement, the Pentagon said its latest operation "sends an unambiguous message".

"President Biden will act to protect American and Coalition personnel. At the same time, we have acted in a deliberate manner that aims to de-escalate the overall situation in both eastern Syria and Iraq," it said.

quote
"At the same time, we have acted in a deliberate manner that aims to de-escalate the overall situation in both eastern Syria and Iraq," it said. "

That is some interesting double speak,