Seen in Print
-
Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 42214
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
-
rex desilets
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:18 pm
Re: Seen in Print
A despicable example of toxic masculinity...
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams
Re: Seen in Print
rex desilets wrote:A despicable example of toxic masculinity...
You didn;t even say that with a
.roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Seen in Print
I have heard of the impossible burger. This must be the impossible chicken. 
-
rex desilets
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:18 pm
Re: Seen in Print
I did assume that use of the current lexicon would obviate the need for an emojirogruth wrote:rex desilets wrote:A despicable example of toxic masculinity...
You didn;t even say that with a
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams
-
MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Seen in Print
.
Last edited by MurphOnMillerAve on Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Seen in Print
They must need better cameras. She don't look naked in that photo to me.
My eyes are bad but I can still see naked women.
I think.
Maybe.
My eyes are bad but I can still see naked women.
I think.
Maybe.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Seen in Print
rogruth wrote:They must need better cameras. She don't look naked in that photo to me.
My eyes are bad but I can still see naked women.
Wait 'til Ruth hears about this!
It looks to me, like they pixelated the naughty bits. The camera was far enough away that you wouldn't see much anyhow.
Re: Seen in Print
My wife, Ruthlane, told me years ago, @65+, that it was OK to window shop but I best not handle the merchandise.
And I never have.
And I never have.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Seen in Print
And as I said, it's hard for me to tell. 
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Seen in Print
Roger,
The quality of the image is poor. If you look closely you (or at least I) can see a square area over her crotch. Can't be certain about up top, but from that distance, put it in the so what file.
Had to kid you a bit!
Rich
The quality of the image is poor. If you look closely you (or at least I) can see a square area over her crotch. Can't be certain about up top, but from that distance, put it in the so what file.
Had to kid you a bit!
Rich
Re: Seen in Print
Roger,
The quality of the image is poor. If you look closely you (or at least I) can see a square area over her crotch. Can't be certain about up top, but from that distance, put it in the so what file.
Had to kid you a bit!
Rich
The quality of the image is poor. If you look closely you (or at least I) can see a square area over her crotch. Can't be certain about up top, but from that distance, put it in the so what file.
Had to kid you a bit!
Rich
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests