Seen in Print

Play nice and have fun... AS OF JULY 12 2025, THIS FORUM IS LOCKED.
User avatar
Rufus T. Firefly
Posts: 42217
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
Location: To be Determined

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Rufus T. Firefly » Thu Apr 18, 2019 2:52 pm

HONDO74 wrote:5th Avenue Easter Parade, New York City, April 19, 1908


Some miserable looking men in that photo........
What if lollipops moaned every time we licked them?

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15422
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Thu Apr 18, 2019 3:54 pm

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
HONDO74 wrote:5th Avenue Easter Parade, New York City, April 19, 1908


Some miserable looking men in that photo........


Image
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15422
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:28 pm

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
webenda wrote:Lamination should not be necessary, there are tons of old growth oak trees left, just none in France.


Not of what's really needed - consider cutting a 12" x 18" beam (probably too small) from a tree and you need a 40' long beam as well and also should not incorporate heartwood. That requires a 4' diameter tree at the far upper end of the tree for such a log. Other requirement is that it be straight. Next requirement is that it be white oak. Live oak rarely grows to suitable length straight to make suitable beams. Next requirement would be that it be dry and workable which takes a good bit of time to achieve.

Make it hard why don't you Rufus?

The beams are 24 x 24 inches x 20 to 30 feet. Each beam required one tree. 13,000 individual trees in total were felled in the King's forest to build the roof. The trees were likely 300 to 400 years old. In other words, the trees used to build the cathedral sprouted in the eighth or ninth centuries.

The biggest white oak beams I can find are 12 x 12 x 16 feet.

There are a few white oaks big enough but they are individual trees in various locations. 13,000 :shock: Maybe the wood required is not available anywhere on earth.

I've got it! Replant the Kings Forest (as they should have in 1163 and again in 1230) and in 2319 the wood will be available.

Data gleaned from various unreliable sources.
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
Rufus T. Firefly
Posts: 42217
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
Location: To be Determined

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Rufus T. Firefly » Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:47 pm

webenda wrote:Make it hard why don't you Rufus?


No harder than it has to be or as hard as white oak.

The beams are 24 x 24 inches x 20 to 30 feet.


Big beams from big trees that probably provided a lot of other parts. Probably not wasted.

The biggest white oak beams I can find are 12 x 12 x 16 feet.


I've got some 12 x 8 but they are shorter........ One might be chestnut, :wink:

There are a few white oaks big enough but they are individual trees in various locations. 13,000 :shock: Maybe the wood required is not available anywhere on earth.


Probably not if restricted to white oak.

I've got it! Replant the Kings Forest (as they should have in 1163 and again in 1230) and in 2319 the wood will be available.


Gather those acorns now...........

Does give one pause as to the enormity of it all that just the trees to get those beams had that level of demand and complexity. Gives one another appreciation for tree farmers. I think I'll take a walk through my woods to see how the various parts are coming along now.
What if lollipops moaned every time we licked them?

User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Thu Apr 18, 2019 11:22 pm

One of those you circled is a woman.

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15422
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:15 am

MurphOnMillerAve wrote:One of those you circled is a woman.

Deliberate. 5.1% of women identify as LGBT.
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
Roy
Posts: 7849
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: Lakewood, CA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Roy » Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:49 am

The roof beams are not visible, unless the ends protrude from the outer walls. So, they add nothing to the appearance of either the interior, or exterior of the building. Why use precious wood, that serves only to make the structure more susceptible to burning? Use steel reinforced, prestressed concrete beams, or just steel I or box beams. If the ends do protrude from the outer walls, they can be covered with wood.
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.

User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Fri Apr 19, 2019 7:43 am

webenda wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:One of those you circled is a woman.

Deliberate. 5.1% of women identify as LGBT.

Brava (!)

sleepmac
Posts: 658
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:10 pm

Re: Seen in Print

Postby sleepmac » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:05 am

Roy, I wonder if the heavier weight of concrete/steel beams would be too much for the stone walls?

Dan Weinhold

User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:18 am

sleepmac wrote:Roy, I wonder if the heavier weight of concrete/steel beams would be too much for the stone walls?

Dan Weinhold

That sounds like a very pertinent point, Dan. The stone walls barely had the power to hold themselves up to the height wanted for the tall windows; hence, the use of the "Flying Buttresses" to add support from the outside, which is the direction the walls would have leaned toward without the buttresses.

So, between Roy's suggestion and your caution, a lot has to be solved.
Last edited by MurphOnMillerAve on Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

HONDO74
Posts: 9140
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Midway USA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby HONDO74 » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:23 am

webenda wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:One of those you circled is a woman.

Deliberate. 5.1% of women identify as LGBT.


Was LGBT that prevalent back in 1908 New York :?:

User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:30 am

HONDO74 wrote:
webenda wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:One of those you circled is a woman.

Deliberate. 5.1% of women identify as LGBT.


Was LGBT that prevalent back in 1908 New York :?:

Perhaps some covert version and/or incubation (keeping something under the right conditions so it can develop) of it?

NJPiney
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:11 am

Re: Seen in Print

Postby NJPiney » Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:30 am

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
HONDO74 wrote:5th Avenue Easter Parade, New York City, April 19, 1908


Some miserable looking men in that photo........


Divorce was less prevalent back then

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15422
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:21 pm

MurphOnMillerAve wrote:
HONDO74 wrote:
webenda wrote:Deliberate. 5.1% of women identify as LGBT.


Was LGBT that prevalent back in 1908 New York :?:

Perhaps some covert version and/or incubation (keeping something under the right conditions so it can develop) of it?

LGBT is a new acronym. Lesbian relationships are not new.

In 1908, the first American defense of homosexuality was published. The Intersexes: A History of Similisexualism as a Problem in Social Life, was written by Edward Stevenson under the pseudonym Xavier Mayne. This 600-page defense detailed Classical examples, but also modern literature and the homosexual subcultures of urban life.

"1895: Edra and Mildred live together; on the outside they are innocent spinsters, but their actual relationship is that of lesbian lovers."

From the novel, The Persecution of Mildred Dunlap, based on a true story.
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15422
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:18 am

----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard


Return to “The Club Car Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests