HONDO74 wrote:That must have been like trying to glide a brick to the ground..
Like pigs & pumpkins, given enough thrust bricks are surprisingly aerodynamic...
HONDO74 wrote:That must have been like trying to glide a brick to the ground..
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:up148 wrote:When I read that I become livid. The gate has to swing both ways. If the left can do what they want and not be considered hateful and intolerant in their beliefs then the right ought to be able to do the same. And we wonder why this country is so divided.![]()
![]()
![]()
It's $250 - write them a check if you feel livid.
I'm more irritated that GU supports any of these idiotic groups at all - for what tuition costs there, maybe they should go to class and get an education instead of wasting time and money both.
“If we cannot safely advocate for beliefs synonymous with Catholic social teaching,” she said, “then no group at Georgetown can be certain of its security.”
Can them all and get over it, and go back to being an educational institute.
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:webenda wrote:The aircraft was metric, the ground crew was not.
Located out of where?
Montreal, 23 July 1983. Canada went metric in 1975, but the ground crew was used to the old Imperial measures on existing aircraft.............the fuel quantity indicating system on the AC 767 was inoperative on the day of the flight.
I might have wondered if it permitted to fly then.....maybe not any more after this happened
HONDO74 wrote:webenda wrote: The pilot managed to glide the plane down safely as he was a very experienced glider pilot. 22,300 pounds of jet fuel had been put in instead of 22,300 kg.
Big difference between a glider and a 767. That must have been like trying to glide a brick to the ground..
up148 wrote:
+1. Actually, I didn't read the article, only read Hondo's paraphrasing.![]()
![]()
I don't send money to campaigns or causes anymore....except maybe "Rufus for President 2020".![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
up148 wrote:Most aviation accidents are pilot (crew) error. The have gauges in the cockpit (just like cars) that tell you how much fuel was put on. Both pilots had their heads up the *sses, and I doubt if either is still flying commercially.
BH
HONDO74 wrote:This is on the internet so it has to be true, right
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:HONDO74 wrote:This is on the internet so it has to be true, right
Absolutely...........at least my Magic 8 Ball says so.....
webenda wrote:up148 wrote:Most aviation accidents are pilot (crew) error. The have gauges in the cockpit (just like cars) that tell you how much fuel was put on. Both pilots had their heads up the *sses, and I doubt if either is still flying commercially.
BH
Boeing took the blame for an instruction manual disconnect that caused the fuel load error.
The pilot, Captain Robert Pearson, is still considered a hero.
Pearson is 78 years old today and retired, so he is not flying commercially but not for the reason you suggested.
Co-Pilot, Maurice Quintal, became a pilot after the fuel error incident and continued flying commercially. Quintal died at age 68 on September 24, 2015, in Saint-Donat, Quebec, so he is not still flying commercially either.
Mitch wrote:The other thing about the metric system: Over 200 years ago, we broke away from the rest of the world to become our own sovereign country. Number and measuring systems should remain Imperial. What's up with you, Wayne. Ya think we should speak Spanish too 'cause we're soon gonna be outnumbered?
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests