You bet.up148 wrote:Roy wrote:MurphOnMillerAve wrote:P.S. I wonder how the action of posting there came to be called "tweeting." I should have thought it would have been called: "twittering" ?Or the shorter: "Twitting," although I can understand why being called a Twitterer didn't make the cut.
So, is the President the tweeter-in-chief, or the twit-in-chief? He acts like a cyber bully. For someone with all the money and power in the world, he's astonishingly immature.
I think you'll have few contradicting you on this forum.
BH
All the "Right People," Democrats and Establishment Republicans, just hate the tweets.
The tweets serve two purposes: a) instead of turgid pronouncements, POTUS makes a point without misinterpretation by the democrat press (which is all of them). b) it's genius-level trolling. He trots out a tweet and it is the equivalent of hollering "Squirrel" to a dog. And the press falls for it every damn time. You'd think they would have learned after nine months, but like democrats everywhere they learn nothing and forget nothing.
My schadenboner is just as firm now as it was last Nov 8.