Seen in Print

Play nice and have fun... AS OF JULY 12 2025, THIS FORUM IS LOCKED.
Locked
HONDO74
Posts: 9140
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Midway USA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby HONDO74 » Tue May 16, 2017 6:58 pm

Image
Top
J. S. Bach
Posts: 5820
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:30 pm

Re: Seen in Print

Postby J. S. Bach » Tue May 16, 2017 10:17 pm

HONDO74 wrote:Image

Hmmm, I have seen that before:
Image
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Tue May 16, 2017 10:43 pm

I do NOT understand the above. :? :?
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Tue May 16, 2017 10:44 pm

Dave,
Is your tag line from experience?
I do agree that that would be a no-no. :roll: :roll:
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:
Contact MurphOnMillerAve

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Tue May 16, 2017 11:04 pm

rogruth wrote:I do NOT understand the above. :? :?

I think the women are making statements visually about the sizes of the equipment using the urinals. That's my guess.
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Tue May 16, 2017 11:07 pm

Really. Well OK.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
E7
Posts: 8404
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:35 am

Re: Seen in Print

Postby E7 » Tue May 16, 2017 11:47 pm

MurphOnMillerAve wrote:OMG. And just whom do they suggest should take on the job of "putting it on" ? AND I can certainly imagined some resistance from the animals, too!


Maybe if you engaged in a bit of foreplay before you tried to slide it on! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Top
User avatar
Rufus T. Firefly
Posts: 42219
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
Location: To be Determined

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Rufus T. Firefly » Wed May 17, 2017 7:36 am

E7 wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:OMG. And just whom do they suggest should take on the job of "putting it on" ? AND I can certainly imagined some resistance from the animals, too!


Maybe if you engaged in a bit of foreplay before you tried to slide it on! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Oh, my!
What if lollipops moaned every time we licked them?
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Wed May 17, 2017 7:50 am

Next topic or weird TRAIN of thought please. :roll:
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:
Contact MurphOnMillerAve

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Wed May 17, 2017 7:53 am

E7 wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:OMG. And just whom do they suggest should take on the job of "putting it on" ? AND I can certainly imagined some resistance from the animals, too!


Maybe if you engaged in a bit of foreplay before you tried to slide it on! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You first. :P I'll be leaving the area. :shock:
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Wed May 17, 2017 8:03 am

MurphOnMillerAve wrote:
E7 wrote:
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:OMG. And just whom do they suggest should take on the job of "putting it on" ? AND I can certainly imagined some resistance from the animals, too!


Maybe if you engaged in a bit of foreplay before you tried to slide it on! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You first. :P I'll be leaving the area. :shock:

That's smart.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
User avatar
Rufus T. Firefly
Posts: 42219
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
Location: To be Determined

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Rufus T. Firefly » Wed May 17, 2017 8:05 am

rogruth wrote:Next topic or weird TRAIN of thought please. :roll:


Does your train of thought have a caboose?
What if lollipops moaned every time we licked them?
Top
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Wed May 17, 2017 8:22 am

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
rogruth wrote:Next topic or weird TRAIN of thought please. :roll:


Does your train of thought have a caboose?

Ready? Pretty much open ended.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Top
User avatar
MurphOnMillerAve
Posts: 18489
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Kennywood Park
Contact:
Contact MurphOnMillerAve

Re: Seen in Print

Postby MurphOnMillerAve » Wed May 17, 2017 8:37 am

Tooooeeetally different "topic": I just saw, for the first time, on a map of the broader area around here, that there is a street named REDNECK. Wow. Who thought of that and what was their intention, one could wonder. It made me smile, though.
Top
HONDO74
Posts: 9140
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Midway USA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby HONDO74 » Wed May 17, 2017 9:00 am

Image
Top
Locked

Return to “The Club Car Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 122 guests