Seen in Print

Play nice and have fun... AS OF JULY 12 2025, THIS FORUM IS LOCKED.
HONDO74
Posts: 9140
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Midway USA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby HONDO74 » Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:48 am

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
E7 wrote: I haven't met many elderly disabled children that were pregnant!


Not many? Then you have met some?

Fascinating........

Or, were they just not pregnant?


Probably just full of S..T, makes them look pregnant. :lol:

As for me I blame in on dark ale. :mrgreen: :lol: :lol: :lol:

E7
Posts: 8404
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:35 am

Re: Seen in Print

Postby E7 » Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:33 am

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
E7 wrote: I haven't met many elderly disabled children that were pregnant!


Not many? Then you have met some?

Fascinating........

Or, were they just not pregnant?


Zero could be defined as not many! :mrgreen:

User avatar
Rufus T. Firefly
Posts: 42219
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
Location: To be Determined

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Rufus T. Firefly » Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:56 am

E7 wrote:
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
E7 wrote: I haven't met many elderly disabled children that were pregnant!


Not many? Then you have met some?

Fascinating........

Or, were they just not pregnant?


Zero could be defined as not many! :mrgreen:


Could be, but then "not many" can does imply more than zero, thus "some".....
What if lollipops moaned every time we licked them?

User avatar
robert.
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:24 am

Re: Seen in Print

Postby robert. » Sat Mar 04, 2017 2:07 pm

May be the pc. way of saying nobody can use this restroom. An out of order sign would work just as well
I spend entirely too many hours a day tying my shoes

User avatar
rex desilets
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:18 pm

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rex desilets » Sat Mar 04, 2017 2:53 pm

Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
E7 wrote:
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:
Not many? Then you have met some?

Fascinating........

Or, were they just not pregnant?


Zero could be defined as not many! :mrgreen:


Could be, but then "not many" can does imply more than zero, thus "some".....
Semantics schematics. whatever 8)
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15423
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:00 pm

`
Attachments
Keep away from fire.jpg
Keep away from fire.jpg (13.6 KiB) Viewed 3162 times
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:25 pm

Wayne,
Is that an underwear label?
The surprising thing is that it says made in the USA.
Is that Union of South Africa?
Or are they old?
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

HONDO74
Posts: 9140
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: Midway USA

Re: Seen in Print

Postby HONDO74 » Sat Mar 04, 2017 6:32 pm

Image

User avatar
Mitch
Posts: 5215
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 2:06 pm
Location: Freeport, Pa.

Re: Seen in Print

Postby Mitch » Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:36 pm

Pretty severe for a minor infraction! :lol:
If you agree with the Progressives, it's freedom of speech. If you disagree, it's hate speech. There are no alternatives.

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15423
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:31 pm

rogruth wrote:Wayne,
Is that an underwear label?

Yes.

Apparently, a warning about washing their bottom is required for many USAuns.
Reference:
A Serious Problem for Some--Skid Mark Discussion
http://ask.metafilter.com/173016/How-ca ... -underwear

rogruth wrote:The surprising thing is that it says made in the USA.

Not surprising, there are a lot of "Made in USA" underwear brands sold today.

Underwear made in USA: Freedom Reigns, Hanes, American Apparel, Duluth Trading Company, Flint and Tinder, Fruit of the Loom, Union Label, Rago, Hanky Panky, Knock Out, Commando, Campbellsville Apparel Company, Ribbedtee, Kings Underwear, Union House, Hard Hhat, Carhatt, Bgreen Apparel, Ramblers Way, Blade and Bblue, Special Delivery NYC, Rei Underwear, Mr and Muse, Swav Apparel, Boxercraft, etc, etc..

rogruth wrote:Is that Union of South Africa?

No, USA stands for United States of America.
Made in South Africa labels look like this:
Made in SA.jpg
Made in SA.jpg (57.58 KiB) Viewed 3142 times

rogruth wrote:Or are they old?

Define, "old." Never mind, I don't know the answer in any case. In the United States warning labels were instituted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. Recently (don't ask me to define, "recent") there have been competitions between companies for who can put the stupidest warning labels on products. I suspect, since they are stuck with applying stupid labels for stupid people, they are trying to have fun with it.
Harmful if swallowed.jpg
Harmful if swallowed.jpg (165.21 KiB) Viewed 3142 times


cb76299fafd9c4a6edbb385694d0aab8.jpg
cb76299fafd9c4a6edbb385694d0aab8.jpg (57.49 KiB) Viewed 3137 times


Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20040609013 ... w.org/wwl/
Last edited by webenda on Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:49 pm

Hmmm. I have Hanes underwear. The newest, 2016, was made in El Salvador and some from 2015 was made in Indonesia.
Older than that, I guess.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

User avatar
robert.
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:24 am

Re: Seen in Print

Postby robert. » Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:09 pm

toothpaste label.
toothpaste-label-warning.jpg
I spend entirely too many hours a day tying my shoes

User avatar
webenda
Posts: 15423
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:05 pm
Location: Columbia

Re: Seen in Print

Postby webenda » Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:11 pm

rogruth wrote:Hmmm. I have Hanes underwear. The newest, 2016, was made in El Salvador and some from 2015 was made in Indonesia.
Older than that, I guess.

Good sleuthing into your underwear Roger. :D

"Hanes is a Classic American Company that makes standard and reliable underwear. Hanes is most widely known for their basic white collection. A standard in everyone's drawer. Hanes is made in the USA but sold around the world.Jul 4, 2014"
Reference: http://www.underwearexpert.com/2014/07/ ... pport-you/

Apparently, things changed at Hanes after 2014 (or Underwear Expert was wrong in the first place.)

Or... maybe you have counterfeit underwear. :shock:
----Wayne----

Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:36 pm

Looks like underwear, feels like underwear so I dont think I care.
:D :D :D :roll: :roll: :roll: :wink: :wink: :wink:
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Re: Seen in Print

Postby rogruth » Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:37 pm

Think I better go read my toothpaste label.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH


Return to “The Club Car Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 59 guests