Hobo Jungle

Play nice and have fun... AS OF JULY 12 2025, THIS FORUM IS LOCKED.
User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Postby rogruth » Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:06 pm

Right, Frank, but the one from Highrailjon shows otherwise. In use they would get out of sync.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

Frank in Steam
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 2:06 pm

Postby Frank in Steam » Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:26 pm

Right, I don't think they would stay in synch for more than one start up or through more than the first tight curve that would cause some different rates of slippage between the two engines.
Frank Dz
If its worth doing, its worth doing to wretched excess!
www.fctt-hirailers.com

User avatar
penncentral8885
Posts: 3012
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: Indiana

Postby penncentral8885 » Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:17 pm

I have a documentary on the problems with compound and articulated steam on the PRR, it describes the problems of the unequal pull of either set of drivers, as you can see on Jon's model, what was done is the first release of steam from the throttle went to the rear drivers, they had the most weight and were not as prone to slip, then the exaust from those cylindes went to the foward set, the steam not a volitile as when it was first released then was used again and the blown out the stack.they did this becouse the front set of wheels would be the first to hit frost,leaves,snow,weeds,or what ever and start spinning.
the large upper pipe that is just below the walkway that runs to the back cylinders comes right out of the dry pipe from the throttle, if you follow the lower pipe you can see it ties into the back side of the rear intake/exaust valve and leads to the foward set of valves.
positioning of the rods made no difference due to the fact that each set of drivers were ballanced as a set, the rods could be seen in any type of location although I agree with Tramp,they look pretty cool working together!
hope that helps!

User avatar
2railjon
Posts: 15906
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:33 pm

Postby 2railjon » Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:13 pm

Works for me, Penn. Thanks! All this schoolin' has givin' me a powerful thirst. Oh, look! It's beer-thirty. :D
Tomorrow's class we'll discuss special purpose camelbacks.
Image

User avatar
Tramp
Posts: 4735
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Down East
Contact:

Postby Tramp » Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:01 pm

As things seem to crumble around us, I know only a few things. Beer tastes and feels good. I like being a cyberbo. I liked the tracks and tits. You get very few true friends; treasure them. D's pool game is getting freakin' special. March is almost over. There's more, but what the hell--I'm heading for another frosty pop like a swamp whippet to freedom.

User avatar
2railjon
Posts: 15906
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:33 pm

Postby 2railjon » Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:46 pm

I agree, Bro. Seems like I'm hanging on here by my fingernails. I should have never given up my good paying circus job to move back home with Dad(surprise, dad, new truck!!!!) and help breed goats. Dad really used to enjoy the tits. Now we barely speak.
Image

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Postby rogruth » Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:02 pm

I want to see that mother hubbard in action.
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

Norton
Posts: 2242
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:59 pm

Postby Norton » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:57 pm

I think the steam was used twice only on the compounds. Rear smaller cylinders got the steam first like you say and then it was routed to front to larger cylinders. Because heat energy was lost in the rear cylinders the steam going to the front was at a lower pressure. Thats why the front cylinders were larger. They tried to keep the force equal on the front and rear engines. Less pressure but more inches.
The engines pictured look to be all simple so steam from the rear was directed out the stack, not the front engine.
Mallets were a good idea but I think most were converted to simple by the 1920's
So, who makes a model with 8 chuffs? :wink:

Pete

User avatar
penncentral8885
Posts: 3012
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: Indiana

Postby penncentral8885 » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:59 pm

And look at the guns on that damn thing! :shock:

Del Mar
Posts: 848
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:58 pm
Location: Dumber than a sack of hammers

Postby Del Mar » Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:05 am

You get very few true friends; treasure them.


Amen, brother.

San

User avatar
2railjon
Posts: 15906
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 2:33 pm

Postby 2railjon » Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:30 am

A furry surprise was sent to my email box by DAIsY!! I'll let her explain what it is!!!!! (the missing swamp whippet?)
Image

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Postby rogruth » Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:56 am

Looks more like a young Tasmanian devil. :)
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH

P&R Pete

Postby P&R Pete » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:52 am

Somebody's looking cranky!
Did he/she get awoken from a nap?

Maybe he's channeling Lenny?
Hide the ZW!

User avatar
Daisy
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:26 pm
Location: B&M

Postby Daisy » Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:27 am

It's my new engine. Diesel. Fully loaded. And you should seem him chuff. May have a few odd quirks to him, but he's got to be better than that Berk.

User avatar
rogruth
Posts: 24452
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: pembroke,ga

Postby rogruth » Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:50 am

Daisy , Is that " diesel" an import? It doesnt look like any domestic model I have ever seen. :?
roger

I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH


Return to “The Club Car Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests