
Most "realistic" rock formations are ones patterned on what you would likely see in the area you are modeling. People tend to get fixated on colors (they are important) but the overall shapes are more so. The types of rocks and the weathering they are subjected to help define the shapes, the eroded material defines the surrounding soils. The soils plus the "climate" define the vegetation. All of these impact the overall scenery.
We had an interdisciplinary imaging class where the instructor emphasized a "process" for identifying what was going on. Since the class was made up of people with different skill sets/backgrounds including forestry, soils, agriculture, limnology the group could usually piece together a location of a stereo triplet set to a 50 square mile area of the country (triplet only covered 15-18 square miles and had no identification other than the date and flight/photo number. Almost all of us had photo interpretation training but he wanted us to go beyond what we saw (e.g. a drive in theater or a cemetery or junk yard).

