2railjon wrote:OK. Would this Atlantic Coast Line be doable?Looks like it would make a swell ACL Pacific. Might need the odd change in appliances.
What’s the “US” for?United States, as in USRA. That tender lettering would restrict era drastically, I think.
What did it pull?Well, it is supposed to be a passenger loco.
Inquiring Apprentices need to know!
.
- rex desilets
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:18 pm
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
Yes indeed Jon well done, agree with RD, this side looks pretty darn close to your original posted photo too.

Damn good looking engines

Damn good looking engines
Political Consultant- Tap into the hidden powers of your public office, insure your future is jail free, well funded. Visit shock and awe upon your adversaries, dominate the media, thrill your followers. contact morbo@happydaysrhereagain.com
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
.
Last edited by 2railjon on Sun May 27, 2018 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Running that red block Charlie.
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
I think there is a product that is/was made specially for removing printed/silk screened factory lettering .
Might've been by defunct Scalecoat, or Floquil but perhaps their successor still sells it. Anyone specifcally familiar with this?
I used brake fluid, but its hit or miss depending on the original application composition.
I have not had a good experience recently with dipping off Weaver shells or car bodies and still have a few more to do.
So I'm definitely looking for alternatives as well.
Might've been by defunct Scalecoat, or Floquil but perhaps their successor still sells it. Anyone specifcally familiar with this?
I used brake fluid, but its hit or miss depending on the original application composition.
I have not had a good experience recently with dipping off Weaver shells or car bodies and still have a few more to do.
So I'm definitely looking for alternatives as well.
Political Consultant- Tap into the hidden powers of your public office, insure your future is jail free, well funded. Visit shock and awe upon your adversaries, dominate the media, thrill your followers. contact morbo@happydaysrhereagain.com
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
I think it's ALL pretty much a crap shoot, but one I've heard for pad printing is just carefully using a plain old pencil eraser (as in very carefully).
I've also heard very hot water on a cloth (something soft like micro fiber).
naptha
Maybe Sarge would care to comment????
I've also heard very hot water on a cloth (something soft like micro fiber).
naptha
Maybe Sarge would care to comment????
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13644
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
Looks good to me. Get a Sunset 4-8-0 if you really must have accurate N&W steam. I wouldn't have known either. In fact, it is an excuse to open the N&W Steam book. I cannot believe they had only one style of Pacific.
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
bob turner wrote:Looks good to me. Get a Sunset 4-8-0 if you really must have accurate N&W steam. I wouldn't have known either. In fact, it is an excuse to open the N&W Steam book. I cannot believe they had only one style of Pacific.
Pacifics were prolific as passenger engines. Looking at Wikipedia, N&W had 62 E class Pacifics which I am guessing did most of their passenger hauling until the J's arrived. What say ye, N&W experts?
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13644
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
The N&W class E2 had a tender like that. The sand dome, driver size, and presumably the pilot, were different. The gold N&W legend is so elegant it is almost a shame to convert. But that is a USRA, and ACL is not the only road to use them.
If I were going for a repaint, I would try the eraser, then graduate to a new piece of 600 wet sandpaper. Once lettering is gone, I would shoot gloss black on tender and cab sides, wait a week, and decal. But if it were mine, I would pretend N&W borrowed the thing from ACL.
CLW may still have the intriguing tender trucks. I captured a set a while back, and may yet have a Lobaugh ACL Pacific. And someday a Williams class A with a new firebox. We'll see . . .
If I were going for a repaint, I would try the eraser, then graduate to a new piece of 600 wet sandpaper. Once lettering is gone, I would shoot gloss black on tender and cab sides, wait a week, and decal. But if it were mine, I would pretend N&W borrowed the thing from ACL.
CLW may still have the intriguing tender trucks. I captured a set a while back, and may yet have a Lobaugh ACL Pacific. And someday a Williams class A with a new firebox. We'll see . . .
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
.
Last edited by 2railjon on Sun May 27, 2018 4:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Running that red block Charlie.
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
.
Last edited by 2railjon on Sun May 27, 2018 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Running that red block Charlie.
-
J. S. Bach
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:30 pm
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
Looking good.
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
Jon,
Just curious what amount of air pressure you used to remove the letters?
Thanks,
Rich
Just curious what amount of air pressure you used to remove the letters?
Thanks,
Rich
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
.
Last edited by 2railjon on Sun May 27, 2018 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Running that red block Charlie.
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
.
Last edited by 2railjon on Sun May 27, 2018 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Running that red block Charlie.
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13644
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: The 4-6-2 Pacific That Never Was!
You are an artist!
Return to “O-Gauge, 2-Rail, Model Railroading”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests

