Seen in Print
Re: Seen in Print
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Seen in Print
Virginia has good old BUMPASS!
Tony
Tony
- John Webster
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 4:29 am
- Location: Painesville, Ohio
Re: Seen in Print
Ohio has Swine Creek and Mudsock.
My folks had a farm on the hill above Mudsock, just down the road from Gnaddenhutten, two freeway exits south of Zoar.
My folks had a farm on the hill above Mudsock, just down the road from Gnaddenhutten, two freeway exits south of Zoar.
You begin flying with a full bag of luck and an empty bag for experience. The object is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
Re: Seen in Print
I wonder why she did that?
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41588
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Seen in Print
Don’t think. Thinking is the enemy of creativity. It’s self-conscious, and anything self-conscious is lousy. You can’t try to do things. You simply must do things.
Re: Seen in Print
Really?

roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41588
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Seen in Print
rogruth wrote:Really?![]()
![]()
Another great moment in marketing department history...........
Don’t think. Thinking is the enemy of creativity. It’s self-conscious, and anything self-conscious is lousy. You can’t try to do things. You simply must do things.
-
J. S. Bach
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 9:30 pm
Re: Seen in Print
HONDO74 wrote:[/attachment]
Good thing that it was not a .454 Casull Magnum!
https://www.google.com/search?q=.454+casull+magnum&num=100&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=Sg9hU_rCD8m0sAT40oD4CA&ved=0CC8QsAQ&biw=1920&bih=906#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=fgJEX9eYlEJ4hM%253A%3Bn0I_2kTtHHf5AM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Flh4.ggpht.com%252F-_r62QW9X7p8%252FTtSwOixtmYI%252FAAAAAAAAA7s%252FRFRyh-ZOHr8%252Fs1600-h%252F4e7bbc8510ad640647d7a5bc7%252525255B6%252525255D.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Ffrankeschein.blogspot.com%252F2011%252F11%252Ftaurus-raging-bull-454-casull-magnum.html%3B512%3B307
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Seen in Print
Obviously, a man of depth.
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests
