Thanks Chuck. Wow! I never would have found that without your help. Nash/Healey, who would have thought. It the movie David sure drives the sh*t out of it. I thought it was a rare import. But, turned out to be an even rarer hybrid.
Car Thread
Re: Car Thread
Thanks Chuck. Wow! I never would have found that without your help. Nash/Healey, who would have thought. It the movie David sure drives the sh*t out of it. I thought it was a rare import. But, turned out to be an even rarer hybrid.
Re: Car Thread
E7 wrote:
Actually the song was "Born to be WILD"
Methinks you missed my joke....or maybe I missed yours!
I got your joke. Just thought it would be fun to change the word WILD top Mild.
Always like that song......
Re: Car Thread
Ever ridden in the back of one of these? I have. Not fun.
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41906
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Car Thread
Roy wrote:[Ever ridden in the back of one of these? I have. Not fun.
I can't even get in the back; I don't fold like that anymore
Just remember: what horses consider play, monkeys consider business, but to Tom it’s all foolery.
Re: Car Thread
Even the 2+2 was miserable, but quite a bit better than the coupe.
Re: Car Thread
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:I can't even get in the back; I don't fold like that anymore
It helped, being four years old. I just realized the photo is probably a later model. My father's was probably a 1963.
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41906
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Car Thread
Roy wrote:Rufus T. Firefly wrote:I can't even get in the back; I don't fold like that anymore
It helped, being four years old. I just realized the photo is probably a later model. My father's was probably a 1963.
I'd bet there's a few differences between the two.
Just remember: what horses consider play, monkeys consider business, but to Tom it’s all foolery.
Re: Car Thread
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:I can't even get in the back; I don't fold like that anymore
Roy wrote:It helped, being four years old. I just realized the photo is probably a later model. My father's was probably a 1963.
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:I'd bet there's a few differences between the two.
I was laying on the cardboard underneath the rear window. That was the rear, in the model in question(Jaguar XKE). I remember the rear fenders sloped forward more than the car shown in the photo. I much prefer the lines of the newer car.
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Car Thread
They were instantly glamorous, right from the start. Swank, even more than the DeLorean. Every young guy thought he absolutely had to have one, though most of us were unsure we'd even fit into the driver's seat, let alone the rear space.. Jaguar XKE - even the name had its own music and attraction.
Re: Car Thread
Looks lovely but drives less than nice. The Old Man had a '71 2+2 and it cornered like an ocean liner.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41906
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Car Thread
MurphOnMillerAve wrote: Swank, even more than the DeLorean.
DeLoreans were just garish.
Just remember: what horses consider play, monkeys consider business, but to Tom it’s all foolery.
Re: Car Thread
I never did care much for any of the XKE coupes until I saw the "Low Drag" model. IMO, the best of the lot!


Re: Car Thread
I seem to remember there was a factory-built light-weight version for competition - maybe that's one of them. The pedestrian version sold to the public suffered from a narrow track (for one thing). Wider tires and a lowered suspension would have helped it immensely, although it would have killed the ride. My brothers and I tried to get The Old Man to at least put better/wider rubber on his 2+2 but he never did...he was spending all of his money just trying to keep the mechanicals in order.
I know two guys that own coupes...they rarely drive them. They're too scared of knicking them up. They have fortunes sunk in them, yet their "investment" is way underwater at this point. This is the part of the collector car kick I don't understand. IMHO, much better to have a survivor car that you can run routinely and not be terrified of.
I know two guys that own coupes...they rarely drive them. They're too scared of knicking them up. They have fortunes sunk in them, yet their "investment" is way underwater at this point. This is the part of the collector car kick I don't understand. IMHO, much better to have a survivor car that you can run routinely and not be terrified of.
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Car Thread
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:MurphOnMillerAve wrote: Swank, even more than the DeLorean.
DeLoreans were just garish.
True that.
Did you ever heard the story that Johnny Carson had one, in NYC, and on one occasion, the doors wouldn't open to let him out. Apparently, he was trapped inside for quite a while. I must confess, I had ogled them for a while, until the Carson story.
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests