Union Pacific vol 2
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Wow! Did someone have too much time on their hands? Fascinating. Most creative.
Dan Weinhold
Dan Weinhold
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Totally unfamiliar with the prototype, but he did a very nice job of splicing everything together.
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Agree. And there is no real need for a prototype when the workmanship is that good. Maroon got a great mechanism, plus a nice pair of pantographs, and probably hated to discard the body - but the original modeler deserves credit. Probably croaked before he could paint it.
Never cared much for double-enders. I always thought the UP Diesels with eight axles were the best looking, with the exception of the double-enders, and I have never needed a water car. I agree - the SP 160C makes a lousy UP water car.
Finally, wild opinion, I never cared for the SP "bloody nose" paint scheme. UP Armor yellow is much better.
Never cared much for double-enders. I always thought the UP Diesels with eight axles were the best looking, with the exception of the double-enders, and I have never needed a water car. I agree - the SP 160C makes a lousy UP water car.
Finally, wild opinion, I never cared for the SP "bloody nose" paint scheme. UP Armor yellow is much better.
- ScaleCraft
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:15 pm
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Moving this from the F-M thread -

Belongs to Maroon. Pomona Valley original.
So, how about a link to photos of those double-enders? I figure this F7 combination does not have a prototype, although the GN did marry an E nose to one of its wrecked electrics. I bet a GN paint job would make it a credible model (although still plastic).
By the way, plastic models have truly progressed - prices now rival good brass models. And no - not my hobby.

Belongs to Maroon. Pomona Valley original.
So, how about a link to photos of those double-enders? I figure this F7 combination does not have a prototype, although the GN did marry an E nose to one of its wrecked electrics. I bet a GN paint job would make it a credible model (although still plastic).
By the way, plastic models have truly progressed - prices now rival good brass models. And no - not my hobby.
- ScaleCraft
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
interesting photo of a prototype....thank you!
I never cared for the UP double end turbine (prototype) but understood they didn't want to turn it around, so it got two control ends. But it was a pretty strange looking beast to say the least. These on the other hand are butt ugly IMHO.
I can't read the writing on the side, but what road or ??? was this affiliated with?
I never cared for the UP double end turbine (prototype) but understood they didn't want to turn it around, so it got two control ends. But it was a pretty strange looking beast to say the least. These on the other hand are butt ugly IMHO.
I can't read the writing on the side, but what road or ??? was this affiliated with?
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Tip: Google "Australian Locomotive photo"
I had no idea - you will find a bunch of these double-enders, along with bulldog noses over flexicoil six wheel trucks, things that look like Alco FAs over six wheel trucks that look a lot like the old and now rare PA truck.
But specifically - this one is an SSR B-61. SSR is Australian for Southern Shortline Railroad.
Want a strange prototype? Visit Australia. They even have Beyer-Garratts!
Again, I had no idea . . .
I had no idea - you will find a bunch of these double-enders, along with bulldog noses over flexicoil six wheel trucks, things that look like Alco FAs over six wheel trucks that look a lot like the old and now rare PA truck.
But specifically - this one is an SSR B-61. SSR is Australian for Southern Shortline Railroad.
Want a strange prototype? Visit Australia. They even have Beyer-Garratts!
Again, I had no idea . . .
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
My favorite UP articulated, the late Bull Moose. Beautiful model.

Last edited by 86TA355SR on Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
bob turner
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Really nice. PSC May have those journals or something really close.
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Weathered an OMI Mike:




-
bob turner
- Posts: 13426
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
Bump. A lot of photos have gone missing from this thread. The ones that survive are posted by 86TA355SR.
So my question: Who is your source - your host - for these fine photos?
This one was my last post to the Lobaugh Challenger thread:

So my question: Who is your source - your host - for these fine photos?
This one was my last post to the Lobaugh Challenger thread:
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
What always impresses me is the clarity and depth of field Aaron captures in his photos....outstanding.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 41902
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
bob turner wrote:....... your host........
His host appears to be shutterfly.com
Last edited by Rufus T. Firefly on Tue Mar 31, 2026 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Egg salad is still chicken salad when you think about it.
Re: Union Pacific vol 2
I have Shutterfly and it's as simple as most I a guess, but I think it's the camera or phone that gives the clarity I'm seeing. I've always been a camera guy going back to the 60's. Last camera I bought was a Nixon DSLR and for close-ups I could never get the clarity or depth of field I get with my I-Phone. So, that camera sits on the self with other film cameras worth almost nothing.
BUT, I'm delighted to have the I-Phone as it improved my photos 10 fold.
BUT, I'm delighted to have the I-Phone as it improved my photos 10 fold.
Return to “O-Gauge, 2-Rail, Model Railroading”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests