1941 City of Los Angeles

Discuss All Facets of 2-Rail, 1/48 Scale, Model Railroading
User avatar
R.K. Maroon
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby R.K. Maroon » Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:09 pm

Brian -- I believe what you have there is is a Sieber Bros. model of the EMD E7. The roof, nose, end, and truck sideframes are Adams and Son. The roof is the later of the two known Adams and Son E-unit roofs. It appears your sides are brass sheet instead of cast, but please correct me if I am wrong. Siebers Bros. bought the Adams castings, punched out the sides, fabricated the drives, and built and sold the model. Here is one I have:

Image

As you can see, mine is only the shell. The unit you have is the first one I have seen that has the original Siebers Bros. drives with it. These drives were originally introduced with the Siebers Bros. E6 (what they called the "EMC Passenger Diesel"). The axle gear on these is a known weak point, so one often if not usually finds these with the axle gears worn. Unfortunately there is no easy replacement. I find I have to find about three truck sets to harvest enough axle gears to make one good drive unit. More about these drives can be found in O Scale Trains Issue #86, Jul/Aug 2016.

Also, note again that most anybody but me would refer to this as Adams and Sons model. I believe I am fighting a losing battle to get recognition for Siebers Bros. and other manufacturers that actually built and sold models using Adams and Son castings, but to me it's a battle worth fighting. Bob Smith at CLW had the right idea. When he had castings made by A&S he provided patterns that said "Central Locomotive Works" on them. Nobody calls those Adams and Son.

There are three of these, yes? Are the other two the same?

Jim
Last edited by R.K. Maroon on Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Slow progress is better than no progress

railandsail
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 11:18 am

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby railandsail » Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:19 pm

You are correct, the sides are a relatively heavy brass sheet.

The fellow has not brought the other two units back by for me to inspect and photograph yet. I'm looking forward to seeing those other units,...curiosity.

Thanks for your knowledge.
Brian

User avatar
R.K. Maroon
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby R.K. Maroon » Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:30 pm

Brian -- I kept thinking I had posted on the Siebers drive train and gearbox. I then realized it was in this thread! It starts in the bottom half of page 3 and goes on sporadically over the next few pages. Here is an ad from an early-post-war Model Railroader:

Siebers Bros. Power Truck.JPG
Siebers Bros. Power Truck.JPG (100.89 KiB) Viewed 8375 times


Jim
Slow progress is better than no progress

bob turner
Posts: 12850
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby bob turner » Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:54 pm

If we assume this was 1951, that is $184 today - enough to buy six axles of CLW or P&D power.

Jim - neither of my iPads are happy with your recent photos, but the Siebers ad came through loud and clear.

User avatar
R.K. Maroon
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby R.K. Maroon » Mon Dec 11, 2017 3:08 pm

Bob -- I have a similar problem when I look at the post from my Apple Mac Air computer. The photos don't load. They show up fine when using my Dell. I will research this to see if Apple products have a problem with loading photos from Dropbox. The scanned advertisement that you can see was loaded directly as an attachment. Attaching photos is more time-consuming than inserting a link and it is a file-size hog.

Jim
Slow progress is better than no progress

Tom Dempsey
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:15 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby Tom Dempsey » Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:15 pm

Came up fine on my IMac

railandsail
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 11:18 am

Adams & Son, Seibers

Postby railandsail » Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:27 pm

Well I finally got that fellow to drop by with the other 2 boxes of 'stuff' he had. Turns out there is
1) an unpowered B-unit for that E7 loco
2) a PA loco

So I'll try my hand a photo posting again....
(Woops, photos posted in opposing order??)
Attachments
DSCF1830.jpg
DSCF1830.jpg (87.2 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1827.jpg
DSCF1827.jpg (249.72 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1825.jpg
DSCF1825.jpg (169.79 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1823.jpg
DSCF1823.jpg (172.31 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1822.jpg
DSCF1822.jpg (91.67 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1821.jpg
DSCF1821.jpg (118.8 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1818.jpg
DSCF1818.jpg (126.68 KiB) Viewed 8303 times
DSCF1817.jpg
DSCF1817.jpg (95.26 KiB) Viewed 8303 times

railandsail
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 11:18 am

PA unit

Postby railandsail » Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:34 pm

Haven't seen mention of a PA unit of this era of modeling....
Attachments
DSCF1831.jpg
DSCF1831.jpg (152.23 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1832.jpg
DSCF1832.jpg (115.06 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1833.jpg
DSCF1833.jpg (259.1 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1834.jpg
DSCF1834.jpg (186.78 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1835b.jpg
DSCF1835b.jpg (126.14 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1836.jpg
DSCF1836.jpg (111.95 KiB) Viewed 8301 times
DSCF1838.jpg
DSCF1838.jpg (110.82 KiB) Viewed 8301 times

railandsail
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 11:18 am

FT unit

Postby railandsail » Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:42 pm

Looks as though there may have been an FT unit somewhere,...by the looks of this one side panel, and a couple of the truck side frames....?
Attachments
DSCF1707, ps1000.jpg
DSCF1707, ps1000.jpg (97.61 KiB) Viewed 8301 times

User avatar
R.K. Maroon
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby R.K. Maroon » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:43 pm

Thanks for posting all the photos. The sleeve for the Siebers Bros. sides is really cool and probably extremely rare (not to be confused with extremely valuable):

DSCF1830.jpg
DSCF1830.jpg (87.2 KiB) Viewed 8271 times

Siebers Bros. was one of several companies that sold locomotives made from Adams and Son castings but there is not much more than a trace of their name these days, as they didn't mark their models (and A&S marked their castings).

The short sides are for the E7, the long sides are for the EB, which I believe is the same for the E6 and E7. That is, there is no difference, at least cosmetically, between an E6B and an E7B. Somebody correct me if I am wrong.

DSCF1827.jpg
DSCF1827.jpg (249.72 KiB) Viewed 8271 times

The built-up EB looks like it has the Siebers Bros. chassis. Bob T. will take note of the rivet baton strips, a feature not often seen. Looks like pretty good work at a glance. While, as stated, I don't believe there is a difference between a prototype E6B and an E7B, there is a difference in the roofs of the Adams and Son casting set for their E6 and E7. This particular EB has the E7 roof (which is more accurate -- the roof for the A&S E6A and E6B is greatly flawed).

DSCF1817.jpg
DSCF1817.jpg (95.26 KiB) Viewed 8271 times


Jim
Slow progress is better than no progress

bob turner
Posts: 12850
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby bob turner » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:57 pm

Yes. Rivet strips are impressive. PA - not so much. But save the trucks and gears for the E-7 projects.

User avatar
R.K. Maroon
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby R.K. Maroon » Mon Jan 01, 2018 9:43 pm

The PA may be an IMP or other early import, but I'm not sure of that. Is any part of this model made from castings? There is a lot more detail on the sides than you usually see with brass sides (Exhibit A would be the Siebers Bros. sides).

As Bob suggests, the drive appears to be US-made. I have a couple of sets of these drives (with the motor mounted to the truck gearbox) and spur gears on the end:

Image

I am not sure of their origin, other than I got them from Bob T. (he will recognize the photo as his own). They could be Exacta but also have much in common with the drive from the all-cast CLW PA.

The FT side looks like Wentzco, as the A&S FT casting set included cast sides. I would guess that all the B-truck side frames that appear in these photos came from a Wentzco.
Last edited by R.K. Maroon on Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slow progress is better than no progress

User avatar
De Bruin
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:24 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby De Bruin » Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:45 pm

Wow, does that look noisy! Do these old drives with a big straight cut gear like this have any kind of viability/duration for/in continuous operation?
I don't object to noisy , but you know would like to get at least a couple of hours a year out of these older (potentially less than bullet proof) set-ups.
BTW Great string !
Litigation Crisis Consultant- remediating legal-media issues; mitigating federal, state and local investigations, court orders etc. Your serial felony history, contractual defaults, bankruptcies no big deal.
contact morbo@getoffthehook.com

Nortonville Phil
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:05 pm
Location: Red Oak TX
Contact:

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby Nortonville Phil » Mon Jan 01, 2018 10:55 pm

Maroon,
.
When I look at that PA it looks like a Cast shell to me because of the thickness of the body sides. At least the nose is a casting for sure. Look at the headlight area where you can see roughness left from the sand casting process. I wonder though if Exacta ever made a copper PA.
Phil Randall
Trinity Valley Traction Co.
Red Oak, TX

My trolley blog:
http://bluebonnetlimited.blogspot.com/

https://youtube.com/@cug6?si=BCFnDDtUw2eVKamo

Dallas Fort Worth O Scale Modelers

bob turner
Posts: 12850
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:57 pm

Re: 1941 City of Los Angeles

Postby bob turner » Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:47 am

Here is the deal on PAs:

Bob Smith was commissioned by Alco before the first unit was built. He and Winnie were present at the Waldorf Astoria when the real thing was unveiled.

From his masters he made 600 more models for "us".

The first Smith castings were the most accurate PAs ever made in the USA with the possible exception of a scratch built or two. The second run of CLW PAs was wildly inaccurate from the cab doors forward. Whatever that thing is above (no offense) belongs in the brass recycling bin, so that someday it can be made into something with a little class.


Return to “O-Gauge, 2-Rail, Model Railroading”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests