WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Murph,
Yes.
Yes.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Cool. Thanks!
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
The requirement for electrics predates the fill in. There was a horrendous wreck in the run to the open air station that mandated the electrics. The 1902 accident lead to the passage of a law banning steam south of the Harlem River by 1908. Some of the electrics were in use in the 2nd version of Grand Central (current Terminal is version 3). GG1's were late to the party, box cabs did most of the work for the first 20 years.
Once I built a railroad, I made it run,
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
That's the term I was trying to recall - box cabs. Were "rats" a part of that motive power family, too, or is that just a term used for some of the toy train models?
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
chuck wrote:The requirement for electrics predates the fill in. There was a horrendous wreck in the run to the open air station that mandated the electrics. The 1902 accident lead to the passage of a law banning steam south of the Harlem River by 1908.
Having already found success with the world's first main line electrification project in Baltimore in 1895, ALCO and General Electric were tasked with designing a new locomotive for the project with Alco building the engine and GE supplying the electrical equipment. The initial prototype locomotive, delivered as Class L #6000, was in the 1-D-1 configuration with 4 gearless "bi-polar" type traction motors which used the axle shaft as the motor armature. Between October 1904 and July 1906 #6000 racked up 50,000 miles in test on a track near both Alco and GE plants in Schenectady, New York.
The advantages of the new locomotive were striking. It was only half the length of a standard steam locomotive with tender and weighed only two thirds as much, but could provide more power, especially when starting trains on steep grades. The locomotive required no turntable and could be reversed for service in the opposite direction in a matter of seconds. With the tests complete an order was placed for 34 additional locomotives to be delivered in the 3400 series and classed T-2 with the original being re-classed T-1.
Unfortunately, two days into the new electric service in 1907 a train led by two T-2 class locomotives number 3407 and 3421 derailed on a curve on the Harlem Line killing 24 and injuring 140.
Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Central_S-Motor
----Wayne----
Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard
Back when I was growing up, if you didn't start someth'n, there wouldn't be noth'n.
--Merle Haggard
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Very interesting information, Wayne.
My only indulgence anywhere near that genre of locomotive has been this 3rdRail scale brass model photographed at the station. Sure is quiet!
My only indulgence anywhere near that genre of locomotive has been this 3rdRail scale brass model photographed at the station. Sure is quiet!
- Attachments
-
- IMG_0004b.jpg (491.65 KiB) Viewed 2125 times
-
- IMG_0010x.jpg (296.36 KiB) Viewed 2125 times
-
- IMG_0011.jpg (644 KiB) Viewed 2125 times
-
- IMG_0012x.jpg (634.32 KiB) Viewed 2125 times
Last edited by MurphOnMillerAve on Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
The photo in the link
SHows the new Terminal in the upper left. That's Park Avenue running diagonally across the picture and the "holes" are the upper level train yard before the developers started filling. Original station was considered "in the boonies" at the time (1870's) (42nd street!).
Even the PRR started making changes to Penn Station before the wrecking crews took over in the 60's. This is what the main concourse looked like at the time of the opening in 1910.
It didn't take to long for someone to realize that the open space could be filled in with more of the glass tile flooring to provide additional retail space:)
SHows the new Terminal in the upper left. That's Park Avenue running diagonally across the picture and the "holes" are the upper level train yard before the developers started filling. Original station was considered "in the boonies" at the time (1870's) (42nd street!).
Even the PRR started making changes to Penn Station before the wrecking crews took over in the 60's. This is what the main concourse looked like at the time of the opening in 1910.
It didn't take to long for someone to realize that the open space could be filled in with more of the glass tile flooring to provide additional retail space:)
Once I built a railroad, I made it run,
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Do you suppose, in the Park Avenue photo, that tall building on the right is the Waldorf Astoria, which would mean we are looking northward, or am I way off in my perspective?
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
I;m not sure but I think the tracks go into GC from the north.
If so I think that would be facing south.
If so I think that would be facing south.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Ohyeah, you're right. So that would not be the Waldorf.
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
No Waldorf, no NYC building, not much of anything at this point in time. Photo is looking south.
Once I built a railroad, I made it run,
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Paris Gare de l'est station:
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
chuck wrote:No Waldorf, no NYC building, not much of anything at this point in time. Photo is looking south.
You are a gentleman who speaks with authority, Chuck, which is something I have always appreciated about conversing with you. My compliments to you. sir.
Murph
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
Thanks but you've got the nice layout! I'm just happy to see the work that you, George, Christopher, et al do.
Once I built a railroad, I made it run,
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Made it race against time.
Once I built a railroad, now it's done --
Brother, can you spare a dime?
Re: WAITING FOR THE TRAIN
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:That's the term I was trying to recall - box cabs. Were "rats" a part of that motive power family, too, or is that just a term used for some of the toy train models?
B1 Rats were used for switching cars at places like Sunnyside yard.
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests